May 28, 2010

Tamron AF 1735mm f/2.84.0 Di LD SP Aspherical

2156FJKYT9L. SL160  Tamron AF 1735mm f/2.84.0 Di LD SP Aspherical
Brand: Tamron
Average Rating
10 reviews

TAMRON AF 17-35MM F/2.8-4 DI LD Super Wide Angle Zoom Lens for Nikon AF more info

moreinfo Tamron AF 1735mm f/2.84.0 Di LD SP Aspherical

Filed under Digital Camera Lenses by .

Comments on Tamron AF 1735mm f/2.84.0 Di LD SP Aspherical »

February 23, 2010

J. Wheaton @ 10:59 pm

Tamron Autofocus 17-35mm f/2.8-4 DI LD Super Wide Angle Zoom Lens for Nikon SLR Cameras
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
This lens is so much fun and it’s really fast too.

March 7, 2010

VY @ 8:33 pm

Great Lens!
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
Since I am not super-professional making money from taking pictures, I was looking for a reasonably priced wide angle lens for my Nikon D700 camera. This Tamron lens is exactly what I needed. It focuses very fast and I take great quality pictures with it.

NOTE!!! If you use the same (or similar in functionality) camera as I do (D700), don’t forget to move the lens’s aperture ring to the locked position! Otherwise you will get an error message on your camera. With the locked ring on the lens you control the lens’s aperture by the CAMERA dial (in manual M or A modes). Another word, the aperture ring should stay at locked (at 22) in any mode, but the actual aperture will depend on the camera setting.

April 20, 2010

Shalom Yariv @ 3:08 am

Superb Lens
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
Bought this lens from Amazon for a 35mm film SLR (Canon EOS 7NE) and it is

the best lens I had so far.

Color & sharpness are unbelievable!

The only drawback is a very minor barrel distortion.

May 17, 2010

Vicky Welsby @ 4:51 am

Tamron 17-35mm
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
I’ve often read the great reviews Tamron lenses get in magazines and have often thought of buying one, but always ended up going for a cheaper option. Finally, I decided to buy this. Was it worth the little extra? The answer is a resounding YES. The lens feels much better built and the results are far superior. The photographs are as sharp as they could possibly be and the colour saturaton is amazing. The lens covers 17-35mm which is great for covering the wide angle/standard range. Anyone who buys this is in for a treat.

May 27, 2010

John S. Zeller @ 8:55 am

BUY ANOTHER LENS
Rating:1 out of 5 stars
I live in the Peruvian Amazon jungle and bought this lens about a year ago thinking it would be just the ticket to capture the vast expansiveness of my surroundings without having to lug about a heavier and sturdier lens with about the same focal length options. Not 8 months later, even though I’d treated the lens with all the respect it deserved, it became contaminated with fungus and could no longer be used. I took it to my German camera maker in Los Angeles when I returned there last month who, after attempting to disassemble same, pronounced it “Kaput” as, because the lens groups are spot-tack-welded, they cannot be separated and cleaned, thus rendering the lens quite useless. Nothing of value could be salvaged from it so I chucked it in the bin. I suggest you buy a metal or carbon fibre lens instead…anything but this plastic job which cannot be repaired when trouble with the lens groups arrives.

June 8, 2010

A. V. Areyan @ 2:23 pm

Very sharp, low barrel distortion, fast and light weight – all at the right price.
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
Bought this lens for my Nikon D50 camera. Coupled with circular polirizing filter and great blue skies (with a dash of clouds) this lens can capture amazing shots. I won’t bother you with all the tech details – you can read that on the product description page. This lens needs good light – by that I mean good amount of natural light or an assist from your add-on flash. My camera’s built-in flash is barely adequate to capture the wide-angled shots. Under good lighting conditions even the basic jpg shots show vertually no pixelation noise. I’ve kept it mounted on my camera ever since I bought it. Sharp, fast and light-weight – that’s enough to make me happy. Very satisfied. Thank you Tamron for yet another great lens.

June 29, 2010

Pork Chop Kid @ 7:58 pm

Nice fast lens.
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
I bought this lens for use indoors at family gatherings and for scenery. I knew this was a fast lens (f/2.8) but was surprised at the physical size of it. I was also amazed at the filter size it required as well. Anyway, I gave the lens to my son (we both shoot with Nikon D50s) and he LOVES this lens. He has taken hundreds of images with it and the ones I have seen are GREAT. Sharp and clear. I should mention that I went with the Sigma 18-50mm because it was physically smaller, utilizes the 58mm filter size available in my camera bag, and cost about $200 less.

July 3, 2010

Syed W. Akbar @ 7:30 pm

Not a Sharp one
Rating:3 out of 5 stars
I bought this lens for my needs to get wide angle shots as most lenses ristrict you to a very short angle. It does the job but I m not very happy with the sharpness the more you go away from subject the more blurry picture you will get. I tried different locations and differnt options but nothing works.

its a good lens if you are only working in outdoors but for indoor although it says its F2.8 but the quality of pictures will not be worth the price.

July 8, 2010

GBW @ 10:20 pm

great lense
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
I use with my Nikon d200 and the lense is wonderful. worth every penny

July 22, 2010

ThomasH @ 2:16 am

Nice going, Tamron!
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
For film cameras, 17-35mm has become the most versatile “very wide angle” zoom range. With digital bodies this focal range translates to ca. 25-52mm, what makes this lens a “wide to standard” zoom. Because the lens is calculated for full 35mm size frame, vignetting is not a problem. Most of full frame lenses are in their best sugar spot, when used on DX sized digital sensors, and this Tamron is not an exception.

The lens is not f2.8 in its entire range, but seemingly Tamron chose to design it this way as a compromise toward making it small and light. Compare this lens to the Nikkor 17-35 f2.8 AFS, both in terms of weight, and also in terms of its very attractive price. Of course, for some users all this plastic is just “too cheap” and is not an acceptable option. Personally I vote rather for less grams/pounds, if optical valors are comparable.

The lens seems to be quite sharp, and tests confirm its excellent resolution. Mine has only very little distortions, however I saw exemplars of this lens exhibiting visibly more barrel distortions! Probably the manufacturing tolerances are not tight enough…

Front element does not rotate with focusing, but the focusing ring rotates and thus the lens does not support the automatic AF/MF overwrite, like in a AFS Nikkor or in a usual Canon EF lens.

The hood is a total loss. It simply reflects too much light on its internal side. Tamron should really coat their hoods for better light absorption, like others do! Fortunately, this lens seem to control flare quite well. I tend to shade the lens with a hand anyway.

Considering the very attractive price, resolution and weight, this is a good product, great value for the money. If you do not like plastic like that, consider than the need to spend $1200 for the genuine Nikkor alternative, and maybe than the plastic will not appear that bad after all.

My generic problem with all Di XP Tamron lenses is however their lack of good grip to perform quick lens exchange. When changing this lens, you will end up turning both focusing and zooming rings to some degree, sometimes to a lot of degree… I wish that Tamron would have made the both rings a bit shorter, and provided good grip in the middle to turn the lens reliably into and out of the mount.

Leave a Comment

Fields marked by an asterisk (*) are required.